Sunday, September 22, 2013

An Experiment in Potraying Joan of Arc


In Dreyer's The Passion of Joan of Arc, we are presented with a direct, well know storyline of an important figure in France's history. Because the story of Joan of Arc is so wide-spread, attempting to collect and then "re-present" her story is quite the creative experience. The list of possibilities of how Joan's story could be told is endless. However, Dreyer chooses to portray the character of Joan in a very specific manner. In fact, he is so specific that we primarily only see Joan in close-ups. Now, why is this? Dreyer ultimately could have filmed Joan in wide-angle shots which would have shown us the very realistic setting and dynamic of the studio. He could have visually shown us the physical space in which she was trapped, but Dreyer chooses not to follow the usual cinematic path of his time period. He chooses to experiment and reveal Joan in both her earthly and heavenly character through the use of close-ups.

Dreyer takes his idea of Joan of Arc and creates an intriguing way in which to present her to the public eye. As Brakhage writes in Metaphors on Vision, Dreyer sees the possibilities in portraying the life of Joan, and decides to experiment, inevitably becoming an artist creating an image that will last forever in viewers' eyes. By choosing to show Joan in a series of close-up shots throughout the film, he chooses to constantly keep us in close, personal contact to this character. She is in constant catharsis throughout the film and we are directly pulled into her emotions.We are drawn into this woman whether we want to or not. We see every shake, twitch, and emotion on her face, and we are constantly in intimate connection with her.

Dreyer has an image of Joan that really is more of a feeling and a sentiment, rather than a physical image of Joan. He sees almost a "hallucination" of Joan, which he then tries to depict in moving images. He finds that portraying Joan in close-ups is what will be the best way to get at this inner, deeper image that he has for the character of Joan.

One question that must be brought up, however, is that of whether or not Joan, in this film, is realistic or idealistic. Because we are in such close contact with her throughout the film, we can connect with her in a very real sense. However, I feel as if we are also distanced from her because of what we see in her close-ups. She has a "saintly" appearance and seems almost on a different level than us. We are able to sense this "spiritual experience" inside of Joan, which brings to question whether she is only an idealistic image and not a real, physical woman. What exactly was Dreyer going for whenever he created the his character of Joan? Does he want us to connect to or disconnect from this woman? Through his experiment of portraying Joan in this very close sense, Dreyer ultimately brings us to question even more, who is this woman?

9 comments:

  1. Dreyer's experimentation was certainly well placed. While no one had approached the Joan of Arc story that way, the plot line fit nicely with the passion narrative of Jesus, which everyone knew. Those dots are connected almost immediately, with the sneering trick questions, accusations of blasphemy, cursing and spitting, and even a reluctant believer remind the audience of the passion of Jesus. An age old story told in a completely new way. A brilliant film.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like your phrasing when you say that Dreyer had "a feeling and a sentiment" for the image of Joan. That description kind of falls in line with the way he chose to reveal little of the set and costumes, and even kept her without makeup, so that the only thing the audience could use to understand Joan were her expressions and emotions. On the other hand, I think this depiction of Joan made her feel more raw, real, and relatable. She seems more like a person and less like a movie character, and I think it allows the viewer to empathize with her even more. We see the expression in her eyes closely throughout the film, and we see her fears and joy. Even though she has this other-worldly task and purpose that most viewers would not immediately relate to, Dreyer portrays Joan without spectacle, but with simplicity and dignity, in way that makes me understand and view her as a real human being.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I somewhat disagree with the feeling that Joan has a "saintly" appearance. Throughout the entire film, I saw Joan as a simple, scared, and somewhat rebellious 19 year-old girl. I do agree that Dreyer had a feeling and a sentiment for Joan, but I feel that he portrayed her in a way in which most humans would respond to being sentenced to being burned at the stake. While most would have simply said that we were lying, if indeed we were faced with that fate, Joan very accurately represented how I believe I would look before facing the stake. I did not see Joan as saintly, but very sickly looking, and emotionally distressed. As she accepted her fate, Joan appeared to be at the end of her emotional threshold and those images really hit me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. After reading your argument, Alex, I have reconsidered the approach I took in calling Joan "saintly." I agree with you in that Dreyer does an exceptional job of allowing the viewer to connect with Joan at a personal level. Like Hannah said, Dreyer uses no make-up in the film and really focuses on presenting a "raw, real, and relatable" Joan. That being said, I think when I initially wrote "saintly," I maybe more so was trying to say the opposite. "Saintly" can bring to mind hierarchy and an image of someone who is untouchable. Rather, I think I mean to say that Dreyer presents Joan as sacred, and as a hierophany. She in fact IS touchable, IS relatable- but she has that sacred sense about her.

      Delete
  4. I somewhat disagree with the feeling that Joan has a "saintly" appearance. Throughout the entire film, I saw Joan as a simple, scared, and somewhat rebellious 19 year-old girl. I do agree that Dreyer had a feeling and a sentiment for Joan, but I feel that he portrayed her in a way in which most humans would respond to being sentenced to being burned at the stake. While most would have simply said that we were lying, if indeed we were faced with that fate, Joan very accurately represented how I believe I would look before facing the stake. I did not see Joan as saintly, but very sickly looking, and emotionally distressed. As she accepted her fate, Joan appeared to be at the end of her emotional threshold and those images really hit me.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree with what you said about us not getting the view her as a physical real woman. I wrote about something similar in my post. All Dreyer gives us is her emotion, no action. Which was what he really wanted us to get from the film I believe. He wanted us to witness her fear, affliction, sadness, and that's exactly what he gave us.

    ReplyDelete
  6. In response to your question, I feel that Joan is extremely realistic. As you stated, we as an audience get to experience a very deep connection with her. Her emotions are real and her reactions are real. I believe that her being this sacred symbol takes nothing from her "realness". She is simply a person in an extraordinary situation.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree that the way the movie was filmed and put together does cause viewers to feel a greater connection and intimacy with the principle players in the film, especially Joan herself. By showing us only close-up shots, we as viewers are drawn into the film and experience a greater intimacy than if the shots had shown more of the background or been further away. I think that it forces us to see Joan's emotions and it makes us connect with her suffering as she undergoes her journey.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I agree that the way the movie was filmed and put together does cause viewers to feel a greater connection and intimacy with the principle players in the film, especially Joan herself. By showing us only close-up shots, we as viewers are drawn into the film and experience a greater intimacy than if the shots had shown more of the background or been further away. I think that it forces us to see Joan's emotions and it makes us connect with her suffering as she undergoes her journey.

    ReplyDelete